Oral and Written Forms of Speech
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51699/ijcm.v13i.191Keywords:
Oral speech, written speech, intonation, melody, writingAbstract
The article distinguishes two types of speech, divided into oral and written speech. Their main features are revealed. Evidence is explained through examples.
References
GANIEVA, S. (2020). ISSUES OF RELATIONS BETWEEN FORM AND CONTENT IN PHRASEOLOGICAL UNITS. ScientificBulletinofNamanganStateUniversity, 2(7), 272-277.
Ganieva, S. A. (2021). HYPO-HYPERONYMIC RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PAREMA AND ITS UNITS. CURRENT RESEARCH JOURNAL OF PHILOLOGICAL SCIENCES (2767-3758), 2(06), 84-87.
Ganiyeva, S. A. (2019). Category of affirmation and negation of verbal phraseologisms in the uzbek language. ScientificjournaloftheFerganaStateUniversity, 2(3), 95-97.
Iskandarova, S. M., &Kakharov, K. S. (2014). THE ROLE OF NONVERBAL MEANS IN COMMUNICATION OF THE DIFFERENT NATIONS. The Way of Science, 45.
Kholdorova, I. (2019). SEMANTIC ANALYSES OF GENERATIVE LEXEMES WITH “BIRTH” AND “DEATH” SEMESIN THE UZBEK LANGUAGE. Theoretical&AppliedScience, (10), 362-364.
Kochkorbaevna, K. B. (2021). Effective ways to Increase Student Thinking Activity. InternationalJournalofCultureandModernity, 11, 256-262.
Kochkorbaevna, K. B. (2021). Effective ways to Increase Student Thinking Activity. InternationalJournalofCultureandModernity, 11, 256-262.
MAMAJONOV, A., &Teshaboyev, D. (2018). Some thoughts about semantics of the complex sentencies. ScientificjournaloftheFerganaStateUniversity, 1(3), 76-78.
Qizi, MuxamadaliyevaMadinabonuBohodirjon. "The technology of increasing the effectiveness of mathematics lessons in innovative educational conditions." ACADEMICIA: An International Multidisciplinary Research Journal 11.4 (2021): 1259-1262.
Raxmonberdiyevna, T. S., &Shavkatjonqizi, S. M. (2021). Methods for the development of stochastic competence in mathematics lessons at school. ACADEMICIA: An International Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 11(5), 863-866.
Teshboyev, D. R. (2021). ON THE SEMANTICAL ANALYSIS OF THE PARYPREDICATIVE UNITS OF COMPLEX FOLLOWING. Theoretical&AppliedScience, (4), 390-392.
To'xtasinov, D. F. (2018). DIDACTIC BASES OF DEVELOPMENT OF LOGICAL THINKING IN SCHOOLCHILDREN. Central Asian Journal of Education, 2(1), 68-74.
Valijonovna, K. I., &Askaraliyevna, U. M. (2021). Use of Modern Information Technologies in Literacy Classes. InternationalJournalofCultureandModernity, 11, 268-273.
Zokirov, M. T., &Zokirova, S. M. (2020). Contrastic analysis at the phonetic level. Academic Leadership (Online Journal), 21(05), 163-169.
Zokirova, S. M. (2021). FORMATION OF CREATIVE LITERACY IN MODERN YOUTH AND THE VALUE OF MNEMONIC TECHNOLOGY. Theoretical&AppliedScience, (4), 240-243.
Мирзарахимов, Б. Х. (2019). Культура туризма как стратегия развития книговедения. In перспективные области развития науки и технологий (pp. 57-58).
Zokirova, S. M., &Axmedova, D. O. (2021). WORKING WITH BORROWINGS GIVEN IN DICTIONARIES OF PRIMARY SCHOOL TEXTBOOKS. Theoretical&AppliedScience, (3), 275-278.
Zokirova, S. M., &Topvoldiyeva, Z. R. (2020). ABOUT BORROWINGS IN THE UZBEK LEXICON. Theoretical&AppliedScience, (4), 701-705.
Бахтихон, К. (2017). MAKON MA‟ NOSINI IFODALOVCHI LEKSEMALARINING LINGVISTIK MAYDON SIFATIDA O‟ RGANILISHI. Актуальные научные исследования в современном мире, (4-2), 53-58.
Зокирова, С. М. (2019). Контрастный анализ синтактических слойных установок. Вестник Наманганского государствен¬ ного университета: Vol, 1(8), 48.
Искандарова, Ш. М., &Кахаров, К. Ш. (2014). Philological sciences Филологическиенауки. The Way of Science, 44.
