Hostile Acquisitions and Financial Methods to Counter them
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51699/ijcm.v15i.235Keywords:
M&A market, hostile takeovers, motives acquisitions, competition, corporate controlsAbstract
Protection methods from hostile takeovers to prevent a change of control over the company and therefore, protect it from competition from other market horrors. The variety of existing methods of protection against hostile takeovers is associated, in first of all, with the individuality of each company, the development of new methods conducting mergers and acquisitions, the emergence of new market instruments capital, etc. The authors come to the conclusion that the effectiveness of preventive methods of protection in comparison with operational ones, since. much harder to deal with already taking place, we want to prevent it. In order for the methods protection worked most effectively, it is necessary, first of all, to competently assess the available resources and build protection based on their availability, as well as to live other factors influencing the choice of protection strategy.
References
Belukhin, VV Institutional and financial component of the modernization infrastructure // Economics of sustainable development. 2012. No. 3 (11). pp. 40–44.
Braley, R., Myers, S. Principles of corporate finance; per. from English. - M .: CJSC "Olimp-Business",2014.
Bragg, S. Mergers and acquisitions: practical. management. – M. :Maroseyka, 2010.
Vorotnikova, I., Pshipiy, I. Mergers and acquisitions: motives, approaches // Risk: resources, information, supply, competition. 2015. No. 3. S. 336–339.
Voskanyan, R. O. The economic essence of a hostile takeover of an organization // Economics: theory and practice. 2018. No. 1 (49). pp. 21–25.
Gerasimenko, V. A. Raiding - a crime or crime // Uchenyezapiski Crimean University. Legal Sciences. 2015. Vol. 1. No. 3 (67). pp. 79–90.
Glinkina, O. V. Strategy for protecting companies from hostile takeovers in the condition sinternational competition. 2018, pp. 17–22.
Gohan, P. Mergers, acquisitions and restructuring of companies / Patrick A. Gohan; per. from English. - 4thed. – M. :Alpina Publishers, 2010.
Gulyatkin, A. I. Methods of price manipulation in the stock market during a hostile takeover transaction. Bulletin of the University. 2016. No. 7–8. pp. 137–141.
Depamphilis, D. Mergers, acquisitions and other ways of company restructuring. - M.: ZAO"Olymp-Business", 2007.
Demchenko, A. S. Legal methods of protection against “hostile takeovers”. 2015. No. 8.
Iontsev, M. G. Corporate takeovers: mergers, acquisitions, greenmail. - 3rd ed., revised. and additional -M. : Os-89, 2010.
Kormshchikov, S. V. Protection against hostile mergers and acquisitions: classification of variousmethods // entrepreneurship. 2011. No. 7-1. pp. 69–73.
Reed, S. F., Lajou, A. R. The art of mergers and acquisitions. – M. : Alp
Ryndina, I. V. Features of the influence of the financial market on the economic development // Economic development: growth driver or challenge generator. 2016, pp. 183–186.
Setchenkova, L., Kustin, D. Hostile takeover: features and financial consequences //financial life. 2016. No. 4. P. 85–90.
Tarkhanova, Z. E., Bekoev, A. V. Protection systems against hostile takeovers // Terra Economicus.2012. No. 10 (4-3). pp. 161–164.
Doytch, N., Cakan, E. Growth Effects of Mergers and Acquisitions: A Sector-level Study of OECD countries // Journal of Applied Economics and Business Research JAEBR. 2011. No. 13). P. 120–129.
Coates, J. C. Mergers, Acquisitions and Restructuring: Types, Regulation, and Patterns of Practice / Harvard John M. Olin Discussion Paper Series. Discussion Paper No. 781, July 2014 (Oxford Handbook on Corporate Law and Governance, forthcoming). P. 2. - URL https://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/20213003/Coates_781.pdf?sequence=1 (accessed: 06/30/2019).
Sevilir, M., Tian, X. Acquiring Innovation // AFA 2012 Chicago Meetings Paper. 2012.
